Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

The Public Integrity Model in Peru: Between Regulatory Formality and Systemic Inefficiency

Lizarzaburu Bolaños E.R.; Florez Alata H.G.; Lizarzaburu M. · Estudios en Derecho a la Informacion (2026) · DOI: 10.22201/iij.25940082e.2026.22.20639

Resumen

This article critically analyzes the Public Integrity Model implemented by the Peruvian State since 2021 in order to explain the gap between its normative design and its effective preventive capacity. In contrast to previous studies on integrity and governance, which have focused on describing institutional arrangements, measuring compliance, or assessing perceptions, the article proposes a critical-documentary approach that interrogates the normative rationality, organizational assumptions, and operational biases embedded in the policy instruments themselves. Based on the analysis of legal instruments, operational guidelines, and official reports, and on their contrast with international integrity standards and ethical governance approaches, the study shows that, despite its formal alignment with OECD recommendations, the model privileges procedural compliance and the production of documentary evidence over the verification of institutional performance. Three structural limitations are identified: the bureaucratization of the approach, the weak enforceability of incentives and sanctions, and the insufficient institutionalization of capacities, continuity, and effective stewardship. The Peruvian case reveals a broader problem of normative formalism in integrity policies, in which regulatory expansion does not guarantee preventive capacity in the absence of effective mechanisms for implementation, monitoring, and accountability. Consequently, the need is raised to reorient the model toward a systemic, context-sensitive, and verifiable-results-oriented approach. Although the documentary design does not allow causal effects on corruption or trust to be attributed, it does make it possible to identify the institutional gaps and mechanisms that constrain the model’s preventive effectiveness.

Instituciones: Universidad ESAN