Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Teleneuropsychology in Latin America: Experiences and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic

Vera L.O.; Dechent C.; Parra Rodriguez M.; Crivelli L.; Capuñay N.S.C.; Brucki S.M.D.; Okada-Oliveira M.; Robert P.; Quiroz Y.T.; Antivilo-Bruna A.; Ramirez A.A.; Lillo P.; Carello M.A.; Torralva T.; Ramos T.; Duran-Aniotz C.; Allegri R.; Slachevsky A. · Dementia e Neuropsychologia (2026) · DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2025-0429

Resumen

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) to deliver remote neuropsychological services in settings with limited clinic access. Objective: To examine TeleNP practices in Latin America (LA), focusing on clinicians’ perceptions of utility, validity, and barriers. Methods: A descriptive, exploratory cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2020 and January 2021 among health professionals practicing neuropsychology in LA. The instrument, validated through a Delphi process, assessed professional background, TeleNP use, patient profiles, applied tests, and perceived advantages and challenges. Results: A total of 212 clinicians from 10 countries participated (mean age and clinical experience=42.7 years and 12.3 years, respectively). Participants were primarily psychologists (75.9%), but also neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists and speech-language pathologists. TeleNP adoption rose from 4.2% regular and 13.7% occasional pre-pandemic use to 58% at the time of the survey, with significant cross-country variation (χ2=79.0, df=30, p<0.001). TeleNP was used mainly for patient (90%) and informant (89.5%) interviews, screening (71.8%), and, in half of the cases, more extensive assessments. The advantages reported were improved access (81.5%), reduced transportation costs (79.8%), patient comfort (66.1%), and easier scheduling (66.1%). The main barrier identified was limited patient connectivity (84.7%). Regulatory knowledge was heterogeneous: 36.7% reported TeleNP authorization in their country, 23.5% reported no authorization, and 39.8% were unsure. Conclusion: TeleNP adoption in LA increased during the pandemic and is perceived as a valid, accessible modality to address geographic disparities in neuropsychological care. However, heterogeneous implementation, regulatory uncertainty, and technological limitations remain major challenges, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines.