Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Seismic resistant behavior of a reinforced concrete structural system and a metallic structural system in the city of Chiclayo

Hans Diaz Idrogo A.; Joseph Perez Correa A.; Luis Leiva Piedra J.; Humberto Olorte García J. · Proceedings of the LACCEI international Multi-conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (2025) · DOI: 10.18687/laccei2025.1.1.1131

Resumen

Seismic movements affect 25% of buildings worldwide, causing structural vulnerability; Peru, located in the Pacific Ring of Fire, makes its buildings highly vulnerable, highlighting the importance of evaluating seismic-resistant structural systems to mitigate risks and guarantee safety. The objective of the present study was to compare the seismic resistance behavior of a reinforced concrete structural system and a metallic structural system in the city of Chiclayo. For this purpose, a study was carried out in which a high-rise building was evaluated under two systems: reinforced concrete and steel, following the current regulations, evaluating the specific characteristics of the area and the regulations (loads, combinations, parameters, etc.) for each system using the ETABS v21 software. The results obtained showed that the height factor directly affected the lateral displacements, on the other hand, in the basal shear, the predominant value was that of the reinforced concrete structure with a value of 211.95kn compared to the steel structure with 201.15kn, likewise, the distortions between floors indicate that the reinforced concrete system presents a higher value of drift at each level. The ETABS analysis showed that the steel structure had better seismic behavior due to its flexibility and energy dissipation, while the concrete structures had higher stiffness and basal shear. The differences in lateral displacements favored steel, however, both complied with the drift limits according to E030.

Instituciones: Universidad Tecnológica del Perú