Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Role of adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients – Subanalyses of the SCCAN study

Cibula D.; Akilli H.; Jarkovsky J.; van Lonkhuijzen L.; Scambia G.; Meydanli M.M.; Ortiz D.I.; Falconer H.; Abu-Rustum N.R.; Odetto D.; Klát J.; dos Reis R.; Zapardiel I.; Di Martino G.; Presl J.; Laky R.; López A.; Weinberger V.; Obermair A.; Pareja R.; Poncová R.; Mom C.; Bizzarri N.; Borčinová M.; Aslan K.; Salcedo Hernandez R.A.; Fons G.; Benešová K.; Dostálek L.; Ayhan A. · Gynecologic Oncology (2023) · DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.014

Resumen

Objective: The “intermediate-risk” (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer. Methods: We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2–4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study. Results: Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT−) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; PDFS = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; POS = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT− and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort: PDFS = 0.365; POS = 0.282). Conclusion: Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.