Predictive Model of Ambivalent Sexism in People who Do and Do Not Practice Theatrical Improvisation

Baldeón G.; Espinosa A. · Psykhe (2025) · DOI: 10.7764/psykhe.2022.51815

Resumen

Can the practice of theatrical improvisation contribute to the reduction of sexism? Previous research on prejudice has suggested that individual differences play a role in its prediction (Hodson & Dhont, 2015; Sibley & Duckitt, 2008). Specifically, on sexist prejudice, it has been found that the practice of certain performing arts can contribute to reducing it (Christensen, 2013). However, few studies have investigated which variables are involved in such a reduction and the role of individual differences on this matter. The present study aims to test a correlational-predictive model of ambivalent sexism, integrating the practice of theatrical improvisation (yes/no), cognitive rigidity, authoritarianism, dominance orientation, empathy, and sex. Participants were 204 young people and adults from Peru of whom 51% practiced theatre improvisation and 49% were female. The results of the path analysis performed indicate that the variables investigated can be integrated in a statistical and good fit model (gl = 1.71; CFI = 0.97; IFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.059; SRMR = 0.04), which poses specific predictors and paths for each type of ambivalent sexism, based on an integration of the theories big three, cognitive-motivational model of dual process, conservatism as motivated social cognition, and affect-to-cognition model. It is shown that authoritarianism affects sexism and that improvisation practice has a small effect on cognitive rigidity and benevolent sexism. Improvisation practice is a limited but potentially useful tool for reducing sexist prejudice if it is part of an intervention. Copyright 2024 by Psykhe 2025, 34, 1-16 ISSN 0717-0297

Instituciones: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú