Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Pandemic preparedness and response priorities in Latin America: A regional Delphi consensus

Méndez Lizárraga C.A.; Armas-González R.; Loyola S.; Bruno A.; Pando-Robles V.; Fernández-Niño J.A.; Muñoz R.F.; Coloma J.; Lescano A.G.; Bravo-García E.; García P.J.; Garza J.; Pardo E.; Welty S.; Madriz S.; Reid M.J.A.; Sepúlveda J. · Public Health (2025) · DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.003

Resumen

Objective: The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response issued a series of recommendations for future pandemic preparedness and response. Latin America's COVID-19-related deaths represented 25 % of the global demises, despite harboring less than 8 % of the world's population. As little data exists to support whether the Panel's recommendations reflect public health professionals' priorities in the region the study aimed to define these priorities utilizing a Delphi study. Study design: A consensus-building modified Delphi technique. Methods: For the first two rounds, participants were asked to rank a list of topics across seven domains on a 4-point Likert scale. Topics voted by at least 75 % of participants in either round as very important were included in the final round. Participants ranked the topics from each of the seven domains in numeric order to define top priorities. Results: A total of 115 responses were obtained across three rounds. Most respondents were involved in direct efforts against COVID-19 (75·0–86·%) and a considerable proportion had more than 16 years of public health experience (37·3–50·0 %). The top priority issues were zoonotic disease-pathogen surveillance systems (27·4 points), robust infection and prevention control programs (22·8 points), and indicator and event-based monitoring and reporting systems (22·1 points). Conclusions: Establishing priorities for future pandemics is critical to ensure better health outcomes. The region should strengthen collaboration and enhance its capacities while conducting country-level analysis and defining priorities for future arrangements.

Instituciones: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia