Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

One Construct or Two? Knowledge Management, University Entrepreneurship, And A Brief Validated Measure

Sanchez-Miranda V.H.; Quiroz-Flores J.C. · Journal of Technology Management and Innovation (2026) · DOI: 10.4067/s0718-2724202600025094

Resumen

Research on higher education in Latin America increasingly combines questionnaire measures of knowledge management and of student entrepreneurship in structural models that posit influence relationships between them, yet rarely verifies a precondition of such models: that the constructs be empirically distinguishable. This study assessed the dimensional structure, reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity of an eighty-item, seven-dimension instrument designed to measure both variables, using responses from 1,092 students of private universities in Northern Lima, Peru, most of whom were employed and had prior entrepreneurial experience. Competing factor models were compared at the item level, and reliability, average variance extracted, and heterotrait-monotrait ratios were estimated. The hypothesized seven-factor structure did not substantively outperform a single-factor model; all twenty-one latent correlations among dimensions ranged from 0.86 to 0.97; and six of seven dimensions failed the convergent validity criterion despite high composite reliability. The instrument therefore measures essentially one general dimension, here termed knowledge-based entrepreneurial capacity. A fourteen-item short form preserving the content coverage of the original instrument was derived and validated, showing acceptable fit, satisfactory convergent validity, and high reliability. The findings caution against interpreting structural coefficients between closely related self-report measures as substantive effects, and provide researchers and university managers in the region with a parsimonious, freely reusable measurement tool and a reproducible validation protocol. © This journal and its contents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Instituciones: Universidad Continental