Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

NEW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GUIDELINE ON ANEMIA CUT-OFF POINTS: IMPLICATIONS FOR CHILDREN AGED 6-35 MONTHS IN PERU

Campos-Sánchez M.; Cordero-Muñoz L.; Velásquez-Hurtado E.; Baiocchi-Ureta N.; Miranda-Cuadros M.; Sánchez-Griñán M.I.; Valdivia-Miranda W. · Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica (2025) · DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2025.422.14028

Resumen

Objectives. To compare annual national and regional prevalence rates of anemia, using the 2001 guideline versus the new 2024 guideline in children aged 6 to 35 months residing in Peru between 2009 and 2023. To assess whether differences exist between guidelines vary by region, setting, or year. Materials and methods. Secondary analysis of the Demographic and Family Health Survey (continuous national random sample, stratified and clustered). Hemoglobin was measured in capillary blood using Hemocue. We applied an equation (and/or table) for altitude adjustment and a cutoff point for each guideline. We calculated 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]. Differences were evaluated according to region, setting, and/or year using a generalized linear model, calculating extremes and quartiles. Estimates and models were weighted. Re-sults. We analyzed 120,711 children. The difference in prevalence was-6.3 [-6.6 to-6.0], p<0.001, varying by region (p<0.001), region-year (p=0.004), and region-setting (p<0.001), between-40.6 and 11.0. The percentage of children whose diagnosis differed was 11.0 [10.7 to 11.2], (p<0.001), varying between 0.0 and 40.6. The difference between the table and the equation was-3.8 [-4.0 to-3.6]. Conclusions. The prevalence differs with the new guideline (generally decreasing, but may increase), with variable differences according to region, setting, and year. The percentage with a different diagnosis also varies. These differences are of great importance for health, in some cases changing the problem from severe to moderate. The table calculation underestimates the equation calculation. Literature supports the direction of the correction, but not its magnitude.

Instituciones: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia