Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Initial steps in the selection of a child development screening instrument in the peruvian context

Cortez-Vergara C.P.; Hijar-Guerra G.; Távara-Campos B.; Ugaz-Villacorta M.E. · Boletin Medico del Hospital Infantil de Mexico (2025) · DOI: 10.24875/bmhim.24000156

Resumen

Background: The foundational elements for optimal well-being and health are established during the early stages of life. When progress does not meet expectations, it is necessary to explore possible disorders, health conditions, or other proba-ble factors affecting it. Health professionals in our country must have access to developmental screening instruments that facilitate early detection of these potential risks and delays, thus enabling timely intervention. Methods: After a pre-selection of the evidence and adequate training of a multi-sectoral panel, a virtual deliberative dialog was held with key stakeholders and decision-makers to determine the most appropriate development screening instrument for the Peruvian context. The evidence was analyzed and discussed in light of the established criteria. In addition, factors pertaining to implementation on a national level were discussed. Results: A set of instruments were obtained and prioritized in the following order: Evaluation of Child Development (EDI, Spanish acronym) ranked first, followed by the Abbreviated Developmental Scale Third Edition (EAD-3, Spanish acronym) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3, Spanish acronym), based on the established criteria. The primary components implicated in the execution of this evaluation on a national scale were subsequently iden-tified. Conclusions: This deliberative dialog has enabled a first approach to the selection of a development screening instrument on the national level, providing valuable information to guide the implementation process.

Instituciones: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos