Fluoroscopy in pediatric radiology: Review of current use and alternatives

Martinez-Correa S.; Morales-Tisnés T.; De Leon-Benedetti L.S.; Lazarte-Rantes C.; Otero H.J. · Clinical Imaging (2025) · DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110454

Resumen

Fluoroscopy has long been an essential imaging modality in pediatric radiology. However, concerns about radiation exposure in children and the need for on-site staff have led to a decline in its use and the exploration of alternative imaging techniques. Data from the Pediatric Health Information System and our institution show a decrease in fluoroscopic studies among pediatric inpatients, from 56,371 per year (2017–2020) to 46,973 per year (2020−2023). Alternative modalities such as endoscopy, ultrasound, and computed tomography demonstrate promise in assessing conditions of the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary systems. Although fluoroscopy remains valuable in certain scenarios, these alternative imaging modalities offer advantages in terms of diagnostic accuracy, accessibility, costs, and reduced radiation exposure. However, the final choice of imaging technique should be based on careful consideration of the specific clinical context, patient factors, and available resources. In this review, we present institutional and national trends on the utilization of fluoroscopic studies over the past years, along with a side-by-side comparison of traditional fluoroscopic studies commonly performed in children and newer alternative modalities.