Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Evaluation of Treatment Modalities and Oncologic Outcomes in Hand Soft Tissue Sarcomas—A Systematic Review of the Literature

Calmet Rocca W.R.; Kuthiala R.S.; Gonzalez M.R.; Pretell-Mazzini J. · Cancers (2025) · DOI: 10.3390/cancers17193204

Resumen

Background/Objectives: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the hand are rare, representing only 2% of all STS. The small size and benign appearance of these tumors often lead to unplanned excisions and diagnostic delay. This systematic review sought to characterize the clinical presentation, histology, treatment modalities, and oncological outcomes of hand STS. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed and Embase was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. We included studies with ≥10 patients with STS that provided data on treatment options and oncologic outcomes. Data was extracted regarding demographics, tumor features, treatment modalities, and survival metrics. Results: Eighteen studies comprising 570 patients were included. Most tumors were <5 cm, and 56.8% were deep (subfascial). Epithelioid and synovial sarcomas were the most common histologies, accounting for 27% and 17% of cases, respectively. UEs were seen in 57% of cases, and 26% of patients required amputation. Positive surgical margins were reported in 16% of patients. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy were used in 40% and 17% of patients, respectively. Twelve and 15% of patients developed regional lymph node and distant metastases, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 20% of cases. Five- and ten-year overall survival were 80% and 77%, respectively. Disease-free survival at those time points were 77% and 74%, respectively. Conclusions: Hand STSs are challenging due to their rarity, small size, and high rates of UEs. Despite favorable survival rates, local recurrence and metastases remain a concern. Early referral to specialized centers and individualized treatment strategies are essential for improving outcomes.

Instituciones: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia