Clinical Practice Guidelines for Common Congenital Heart Diseases: A Scoping Review

Rivera-Torrejón O.; Chavez-Ecos F.A.; Taype-Rondan A. · Sage Open Pediatrics (2025) · DOI: 10.1177/30502225251315623

Resumen

Objective. To summarize the characteristics and reliability of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for diagnosing and managing common congenital heart diseases (CHD). Methods. We conducted a scoping review of CPG for CHD (ventricular septal defects, atrial septal defects, patent ductus arteriosus, and coarctation of aorta) published or updated from 2018 to April 2023. We searched in general search engines, CPG repositories, and webpages of organizations that elaborate CPG. To assess the reliability of CPG, we used the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool, with a score ≥70% considered acceptable quality. Results. Twenty-one CPG were identified. Only 6 (28.6%) conducted systematic reviews, and none achieved an acceptable AGREE-II score. “Scope and purpose” had the highest scores, while “stakeholder involvement” had the lowest. Conclusions. Most CPG for CHD lack systematic reviews and do not meet acceptable quality standards, underscoring the need for evidence-based guidelines to guide diagnosis and management effectively. © The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Instituciones: Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga; Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola