Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Challenges associated with follow-up care after implementation of an HPV screen-and-treat program with ablative therapy for cervical cancer prevention

Morse R.M.; Brown J.; Ríos López E.J.; Prieto B.A.; Kohler-Smith A.; Gonzales Díaz K.; Figueredo Escudero M.; Lenin del Cuadro D.; Vásquez del Aguila G.; Daza Grandez H.; Meza‑Sánchez G.; Tracy J.K.; Gravitt P.E.; Paz‑Soldan V.A.; Carhuaza I.; Carrillo Jara L.E.; Carmen del Caruhapoma M.; Del Carpio-Morgan M.; Garcia Satalay E.Y.; Gilman S.D.; Jerónimo J.; Jorges A.; Jurczuk M.; Kosek M.; Ladrón de Guevarra G.; Lopez Liñán R.; Matos Orbegozo A.; Marín J.; Noble H.E.; Palacios V.A.; Ríos Reátegui R.; Rivas P.; Román K.; Rositch A.F.; Santos-Ortiz C.; Silva Delgado H.F.; Soto S.; Tangoa N.; Vásquez Vásquez J.; Zevallos K. · BMC Public Health (2024) · DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19436-3

Resumen

Background: Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer; however, decreasing its prevalence requires early detection and treatment strategies that reduce rates of loss to follow-up. This study explores factors associated with loss to follow-up among HPV-positive women after implementation of a new HPV-based screen-and-treat approach for cervical cancer prevention in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with “obstetras” (i.e., midwives) (n = 15) working in cervical cancer prevention and women (n = 24) who were recorded as lost to follow-up after positive HPV results. We used the Health Care Access Barriers Model to guide analyses. We utilized manifest content analysis to describe barriers to follow-up according to the obstetras and thematic analysis to report themes from the women’s perspectives. We also report the steps and time taken to contact women. Results: We found an incomplete and fragmented patient monitoring system. This incomplete system, in conjunction with challenges in contacting some of the women, led to structural barriers for the obstetras when attempting to deliver positive results. Women in this study expressed a desire to receive treatment, however, faced cognitive barriers including a lack of understanding about HPV results and treatment procedures, fear or anxiety about HPV or treatment, and confusion about the follow-up process. Women also reported having important work matters as a barrier and reported frequently using natural medicine. Reported financial barriers were minimal. Conclusion: This study highlights the barriers to follow-up after implementation of a primary-level HPV-based screen-and-treat approach. While some barriers that have previously been associated with loss to follow-up were not as prominently observed in this study (e.g., financial), we emphasize the need for screen-and-treat programs to focus on strategies that can address incomplete registry systems, structural challenges in results delivery, cognitive barriers in understanding results and treatment, and work-related barriers. © The Author(s) 2024.

Instituciones: Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana