Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Assessing potential added benefits of trauma-focused content to a guided low-intensity psychoeducational intervention for perinatal women: A propensity score-matched analysis of a nonrandomized trial

Miller-Graff L.; Carney J.; Padilla Cancino E.; Yataco Romero L. · Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health (2025) · DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10094

Resumen

Brief, low-intensity interventions may hold untapped promise for bolstering maternal health in low-resource contexts. The current study used propensity score matching (PSM) to evaluate uptake and differential effectiveness of two low-intensity digital perinatal health (PH) support programs in Lima, Peru. Pregnant women (N = 251) were assigned to one of two conditions (PH vs. trauma-focused PH [TF-PH]) and received weekly psychoeducational content via WhatsApp from a lay paraprofessional for 5 weeks. Conditions were not randomly assigned; PSM was used to improve causal inference of the condition. Women were interviewed before participation (T1), immediately following treatment (T2) and at 3 (T3) and 12 months postpartum (T4). Intimate partner violence had strong negative effects on women’s mental health, multisystem resilience and parenting, and single mothers reported higher levels of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms than did partnered women. Intervention uptake was high, with 77% of women participating in all sessions. There were no significant differences between treatment groups over time, but effect sizes indicated a slight advantage of the TF-PH condition in addressing depression symptoms (dr = −0.29) and multisystem resilience (dr = 0.39). Study findings suggest that brief interventions may be well-received and that trauma-focused supports may also confer additional benefits for addressing depression and resilience. © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.