Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

Artificial Intelligence and Total Electron Content in Earthquake-Related Seismo-Ionospheric Analysis: A Mapping Review

Díaz F.; Cerna N.; Liza R.; Motta B. · Geomatics (2026) · DOI: 10.3390/geomatics6040074

Resumen

Artificial intelligence is increasingly applied to earthquake-related seismo-ionospheric analysis with total electron content (TEC), but whether this literature is converging methodologically remains unresolved. We conducted a mapping review of 56 English-language journal articles retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science to characterize how artificial intelligence and computational intelligence methods are used with TEC in seismo-ionospheric and multi-precursor frameworks. The corpus shows recent growth in scientific production, strong concentration in a limited set of countries, institutions, and journals, and a stable conceptual backbone centered on earthquake, ionosphere, TEC, GPS-TEC, precursors, prediction-related terminology, anomaly detection, machine learning, and deep learning. However, full-text synthesis of the included studies shows that this thematic coherence coexists with substantial methodological divergence. We identified a transition from classical TEC anomaly detection toward AI-assisted decision systems, including models that forecast expected TEC behavior, flag candidate anomalies, classify precursor-like or disturbance-related states, and support monitoring-oriented outputs. We also identified a distinct operational strand focused on near-real-time detection of coseismic and tsunami-related ionospheric disturbances rather than deterministic earthquake prediction. Across these formulations, anomaly definitions, TEC representations, confounder control, baselines, uncertainty handling, and validation strategies remain pipeline-dependent, which limits cumulative comparability and physical interpretability across studies. These findings indicate that the field is thematically focused but not yet methodologically unified. Future progress will depend less on adding isolated case studies and more on clearer anomaly criteria, stronger control of solar and geomagnetic effects, explicit baselines, event-wise and region-wise validation, systematic false-alarm reporting, uncertainty-aware outputs, and transparent documentation of preprocessing and modeling decisions.

Instituciones: Universidad Científica del Sur; Universidad Tecnológica del Perú; Universidad Continental; Universidad Autónoma del Perú