A Universal Guidance Model: The Minnesota Protocol in Challenging Environments

Parra R.C.; Perich P.; Alvarez-Godoy A.G.; Pollanen M.; Traore D.; Vasquez-Guerrero J.L.; Adjibode O.O.; Mbewu-Bodji J.; Jundi S.E. · Forensic Science and Quality Management: Addressing the Era of Standardization in Challenging Environments (2026) · DOI: 10.1002/9781394240401.ch3

Resumen

The chapter introduces the 2016 Minnesota Protocol as a pragmatic, broadly applicable framework that implements the need to examine potentially wrongful deaths. In addition to outlining principles – independence, impartiality, effectiveness, timeliness, and transparency – it provides flexible recommendations for restrictive contexts where complete adherence may be impractical. The authors propose a progressive, context-sensitive implementation that protects investigative integrity, prioritizes victims and relatives, and ensures the dignified preservation of human remains. The Protocol, although not enforceable under law, derives its legitimacy from its empirical development and its adoption by UN entities, courts, and fact-finding missions. Politically and symbolically, any investigation adhering to the Protocol's minimum requirements undermines impunity. The chapter emphasizes that the Protocol's adaptability and ethical foundation render it essential in precarious or adversarial environments, facilitating tangible advancements in truth and responsibility.