Saltar al contenido
República del Perú · Observatorio de la producción científica universitaria
OApol.org Observatorio de Inteligencia Científica Universitaria del Perú
OApol.org
Inicio Universidades Publicaciones Investigadores
Repositorios
Tesis y trabajos académicosRevistas
Indicadores
Ranking trimestralRanking por carreraObjetivos de Desarrollo SostenibleReporte OCDERed neuronal 3D
Acerca
MetodologíaPrivacidad

2021 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Wyckoff M.H.; Guinsburg R.; Schmölzer G.; Welsford M.; Wigginton J.; Abelairas-Gómez C.; Barcala-Furelos R.; Beerman S.B.; Bierens J.; Cacciola S.; Cellini J.; Claesson A.; Court R.; D'arrigo S.; Brier N.D.; Dunne C.L.; Elsenga H.E.; Johnson S.; Kleven G.; Maconochie I.; Mecrow T.; Morgan P.; Otto Q.; Palmieri T.L.; Parnia S.; Pawar R.; Pereira J.; Rudd S.; Scapigliati A.; Schmidt A.; Seesink J.; Sempsrott J.R.; Szpilman D.; Warner D.S.; Webber J.B.; West R.L.; Singletary E.M.; Soar J.; Olasveengen T.M.; Greif R.; Liley H.G.; Zideman D.; Bhanji F.; Andersen L.W.; Avis S.R.; Aziz K.; Bendall J.C.; Berg K.M.; Berry D.C.; Borra V.; Böttiger B.W.; Bradley R.; Bray J.E.; Breckwoldt J.; Carlson J.N.; Cassan P.; Castrén M.; Chang W.-T.; Charlton N.P.; Cheng A.; Chung S.P.; Considine J.; Costa-Nobre D.T.; Couper K.; Dainty K.N.; Davis P.G.; Almeida M.F.D.; Caen A.R.D.; Paiva E.F.D.; Deakin C.D.; Djärv T.; Douma M.J.; Drennan I.R.; Duff J.P.; Eastwood K.J.; El-Naggar W.; Epstein J.L.; Escalante R.; Fabres J.G.; Fawke J.; Finn J.C.; Foglia E.E.; Folke F.; Freeman K.; Gilfoyle E.; Goolsby C.A.; Grove A.; Hatanaka T.; Hazinski M.F.; Heriot G.S.; Hirsch K.G.; Holmberg M.J.; Hosono S.; Hsieh M.-J.; Hung K.K.C.; Hsu C.H.; Ikeyama T.; Isayama T.; Kapadia V.S.; Kawakami M.D.; Kim H.-S.; Kloeck D.A.; Kudenchuk P.J.; Lagina A.T.; Lauridsen K.G.; Lavonas E.J.; Lockey A.S.; Hansen C.M.; Markenson D.; Matsuyama T.; Mckinlay C.J.D.; Mehrabian A.; Merchant R.M.; Meyran D.; Morley P.T.; Morrison L.J.; Nation K.J.; Nemeth M.; Neumar R.W.; Nicholson T.; Niermeyer S.; Nikolaou N.; Nishiyama C.; Nolan J.P.; O'neil B.J.; Orkin A.M.; Osemeke O.; Parr M.J.; Patocka C.; Pellegrino J.L.; Perkins G.D.; Perlman J.M.; Rabi Y.; Reynolds J.C.; Ristagno G.; Roehr C.C.; Sakamoto T.; Sandroni C.; Sawyer T.; Schnaubelt S.; Semeraro F.; Skrifvars M.B.; Smith C.M.; Smyth M.A.; Soll R.F.; Sugiura T.; Taylor-Phillips S.; Trevisanuto D.; Vaillancourt C.; Wang T.-L.; Weiner G.M.; Wyllie J.P.; Yeung J.; Nabecker S. · Circulation (2022) · DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001017

Resumen

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.